[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOLZvyFQPCsU7bnyv=iyz3FSBF72iYiLGKarvCfq6Z=2i_bOVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:08:06 +0200
From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shm: optimize exit_shm()
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com> wrote:
> We may check .in_use == 0 without holding the rw_mutex as .in_use is int
> and reads of ints are atomic. As .in_use may be changed to zero while current
> process was sleeping in down_write(), we should check .in_use once again after
> down_write().
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
> ---
> ipc/shm.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ipc/shm.c b/ipc/shm.c
> index 4e3c883..855ddc0 100644
> --- a/ipc/shm.c
> +++ b/ipc/shm.c
> @@ -304,6 +304,9 @@ void exit_shm(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> struct ipc_namespace *ns = task->nsproxy->ipc_ns;
>
> + if (shm_ids(ns).in_use == 0)
> + return;
> +
> /* Destroy all already created segments, but not mapped yet */
> down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
> if (shm_ids(ns).in_use)
This check here is now unnecessary, yes?
And this also fixes the oops.
Manuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists