[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2d3gm0we2.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:59:33 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy.c: make sys_mbind & sys_set_mempolicy aware of task_struct->mems_allowed
Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com> writes:
> Among several other features enabled when CONFIG_CPUSETS is defined,
> task_struct is enhanced with the nodemask_t mems_allowed element that
> serves to register/report on which memory nodes the task may obtain
> memory. Also, two new lines that reflect the value registered at
> task_struct->mems_allowed are added to the '/proc/[pid]/status' file:
As Christoph said this was intentionally designed this way. Originally
there was some consideration of "relative policies", but that is not
implemented and had various issues.
They're orthogonal mechanisms.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists