[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110805090416.GA4806@becoht-mvanga>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:04:16 +0200
From: Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@...n.ch>
To: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...com>
CC: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@...ap.org>, <gregkh@...e.de>,
<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] staging: vme: add functions for bridge module
refcounting
Hey Martin,
> Actually, it would give you a good indication of how many of the resources
> provided by each VME bridge chip were used. I don't see the refcount
> accurately reflecting the number of users as being important, more as a means
> of tracking which bridges have resources that are being used (and therefore
> can't be removed).
On second thought, I think I agree with Emilio that the _module_ refcount should
reflect the number of users (other modules) using the bridge module. The refcount
of resources should probably stay separate from the refcount of module usage. We
can add resource refcounting as well but I don't see a need for it at the moment.
vme_bridge_get() and vme_bridge_put() in this case should refer to the reference
count of the bridge module (not the resources). What do you think?
Thanks!
--
/manohar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists