[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110805161511.GB3438@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 01:15:13 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
"ccross@...roid.com" <ccross@...roid.com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq: If an IRQ is a GPIO, request and configure it
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 08:29:38AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote at Thursday, August 04, 2011 11:35 PM:
> > But it's not a bug to use a GPIO as an IRQ source, otherwise we wouldn't
> > have gpio_to_irq() in the first place.
> 2) Two pieces of unrelated code somehow accidentally get a GPIO and IRQ
> number that map to the same resource, e.g. due to incorrect board files or
> Device Tree content. This is probably a bug, but ends up looking exactly
> the same as far as the IRQ code's gpio_request call failing in the patch I
> posted.
Right, but this doesn't mean we can break the legitimate users to catch
the buggy ones.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists