linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Reduce clock calibration time during slave cpu startup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 6 Aug 2011 08:58:20 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, davej@...hat.com, yinghan@...gle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Reduce clock calibration time during slave cpu
 startup


* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> wrote:
> > Aside from the bogus comment (I'll send a V3 with a fixed comment), does the patch
> > look ok.
> 
> Several months ago, Robin said that he will test updated version
> 
> [PATCH] x86: Make calibrate_delay run in parallel.
> 
> so any reason that you sgi guyes stop that path?

Running calibration in parallel is pretty stupid: cores/threads might 
impact each other and there might be a lot of avoidable noise in the 
results.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/