lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQWAmjTWGBLrqH9+_AH316Br-McW=PrSyiDWCtSYndL07w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Aug 2011 17:21:39 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, tglx@...utronix.de, davej@...hat.com,
	yinghan@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Reduce clock calibration time during slave cpu startup

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> wrote:
> Aside from the bogus comment (I'll send a V3 with a fixed comment), does the patch
> look ok.

Several months ago, Robin said that he will test updated version

[PATCH] x86: Make calibrate_delay run in parallel.

so any reason that you sgi guyes stop that path?

Please check attached patch for updated version to current tip.

Thanks

Yinghai Lu

View attachment "Make-x86-calibrate_delay-run-in-parallel_v4.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (9170 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ