lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110809150624.GG28228@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:06:24 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	davej@...hat.com, yinghan@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Reduce clock calibration time during slave cpu
 startup


* Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:38:36PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Well, it still uses heuristics: it assumes frequency is the same 
> > when the cpuid data tells us that two CPUs are on the same 
> > socket, right?
> 
> If we only assume that when we have a constant TSC then it's a 
> pretty safe assumption - the delay loop will be calibrated against 
> the TSC, and the TSC will be constant across the package regardless 
> of what frequency the cores are actually running at.

The delay loop might be calibrated against the TSC, but the amount of 
real delay we get when we loop 100,000 times will be frequency 
dependent.

What we probably want is the most conservative udelay calibration: 
have a lpj value measured on the highest possible frequency - this 
way hardware components can never be overclocked by a driver.

Or does udelay() scale with the current frequency of the CPU?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ