lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110809151810.GA14795@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:18:10 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	davej@...hat.com, yinghan@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Reduce clock calibration time during slave cpu
 startup

On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 05:06:24PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> The delay loop might be calibrated against the TSC, but the amount of 
> real delay we get when we loop 100,000 times will be frequency 
> dependent.

We don't have a situation where a system boots with one core in a 
package fixed at one frequency and another core in the same package at 
another. It's possible that they'll float independently due to cpufreq 
changes (although that's not possible with most current hardware), but 
we need to take that into account anyway.

> What we probably want is the most conservative udelay calibration: 
> have a lpj value measured on the highest possible frequency - this 
> way hardware components can never be overclocked by a driver.

There's no way to force the highest possible frequency. Calibration 
occurs before cpuidle is running, and the only way to get the maximum 
frequency on a given core is to have all the other cores in C6.

> Or does udelay() scale with the current frequency of the CPU?

If it doesn't then it's been broken for the past 8 years or so.
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ