[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E414FC0.8070700@ge.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:18:24 +0100
From: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...com>
To: gregkh@...e.de, cota@...ap.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] staging: vme: rename *_slot_get to *_get_slot
On 01/08/11 13:31, Manohar Vanga wrote:
> Hi Martyn,
>
>> If your doing vme_slot_get, then there's also vme_lm_get, vme_master_get and
>> vme_slave_get.
>>
>> Doing just this would then lead to more inconsistency in the naming and
>> wouldn't even get rid of all the functions using the *_get naming convention.
>
> I can simply change those as well and resend :)
>
>> I'm not sure this change is worth it.
>
> I thought it would be worth changing this especially with the addition of bridge
> refcounting functions (which have the *_get/_set convention).
>
The naming of the API is reasonably consistent at the moment. It looks like we
aren't going to need to export vme_bus_get and vme_bus_put based on the
conversation on patch 5. In addition to this, I've discovered that the
functions for USB are actually called usb_get_dev and usb_put_dev, so the
*_put/get convention isn't very strictly adhered to. I'd prefer to keep the
API as is.
Martyn
> --
> /manohar
--
Martyn Welch (Principal Software Engineer) | Registered in England and
GE Intelligent Platforms | Wales (3828642) at 100
T +44(0)127322748 | Barbirolli Square, Manchester,
E martyn.welch@...com | M2 3AB VAT:GB 927559189
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists