[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110811105829.GA11879@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:58:29 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, mike travis <travis@....com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Subject: Re: Missing put_cpu() in arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/sn_hwperf.c?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 08:12:45AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 08/08/11 23:37, Tony Luck wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de> wrote:
> >> The function sn_hwperf_op_cpu() seems to miss a corresponding put_cpu().
> >>
> >> Or is this done in another function? I didn't find it.
> >
> > It would be hard to do it elsewhere - this function may not have done
> > a get_cpu() [in the cpu == SN_HWPERF_ARG_ANY_CPU case].
> >
> > The logic is a bit tortuous here ... perhaps simpler to split the tests
> > up. Does the attached patch look right?
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> You probably want someone from SGI to look at it, so I'll forward to
> Robin Holt.
>
> I haven't been at SGI for about 2 years now :)
And I will bounce the question on to Jack. I believe he will probably
pass it on to somebody more familiar with sn_hwperf. Tony's patch looks
much clearer to me. I would have answered that I thought this was the
right patch until I saw the '... else { put_cpu(); ...' which made me
think we need a closer look.
Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists