[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1313024628.11924.139.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:03:48 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Use dynamic-debug with pr_debug when -DDEBUG is set
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 20:20 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 05:01:37PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Perhaps another way to enable pr_debug use
> > is to reverse the order of dynamic_pr_debug
> > defines.
> > ie: change printk.h:
> > #if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
> > /* dynamic_pr_debug() uses pr_fmt() internally so we don't need it here */
> > #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
> > dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > #elif defined(DEBUG)
> > #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
> > printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > and change dynamic_debug.h:
> > #define DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT 0
> > to:
> > #if defined DEBUG
> > #define DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT
> > #else
> > #define DPRINT_FLAGS_DEFAULT 0
> > #endif
> > That seems pretty sensible to me. Jason?
> cool idea. I like it.
You've got a bunch of patches ready to
be pulled/queued, so I think you should
do it.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists