[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E436D89.6000201@netapp.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:20:01 +0530
From: Sreeram B S <sreeramb@...app.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UDP requires 2 reads to obtain vital information - Kindly comment
Hi all,
Thanks for all the replies.
Yes, it worked wonderfully upon setting the msg_name to the address
of the place-holder for peer-address!
Regards,
Sreeram
On 08/10/2011 11:20 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 10 août 2011 à 22:27 +0530, Sreeram B S a écrit :
>> Respected people,
>> I am Sreeram. I work on TCP/IP network applications.
>> This mail is regarding UDP.
>> Whenever a UDP datagram arrives, the receiver may wish to know the
>> sender's IP address and also the destination address of that datagram.
>> The recvfrom() function will return the sender's IP address. If the
>> destination address of the datagram is required, then the user has to
>> set the IP_PKTINFO socket option for the UDP socket and get the
>> address as ancillary data in recvmsg(). So, the point here is that the
>> user has to issue 2 reads on the same datagram (with the flag MSG_PEEK
>> in first read call enabled) in order to obtain the sender's IP and the
>> destination IP of the datagram. I personally feel that there should be
>> a way provided to the user to obtain these values in a single read
>> call. By doing this I am sure that lot of time would be saved in
>> collecting the required information.
>> I have written a simple UDP client program to show that we need 2
>> reads to obtain the above information. I have made it signal-driven
>> just to make it interesting and not for any other reason. I have
>> attached the client program along with this mail.
>> Fortunately, as mentioned above, Linux provides the IP_PKTINFO
>> socket option, enabling which, will send in a structure 'struct
>> in_pktinfo' as ancillary data in recvmsg(). The structure is as
>> follows:
>>
>> struct in_pktinfo {
>> unsigned int ipi_ifindex; /* Interface index */
>> struct in_addr ipi_spec_dst; /* Local address */
>> struct in_addr ipi_addr; /* Header Destination
>> address */
>> };
>>
>> Would it be incorrect if I request the kernel coders to add the
>> sender's IP address as well in this structure, so that the user will
>> get both the sender's IP and the destination IP address of the
>> datagram in a single call to recvmsg()?
>> I very well understand that my knowledge is very much diminished.
>> Hence I request you to kindly correct me if what I have
>> understood/suggested is incorrect.
>> Please suggest.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sreeram
>
> Part of your program :
>
> /* Now receive the destination address. */
> iov[0].iov_base = mesg;
> iov[0].iov_len = 1;
> msg.msg_name = NULL;<< HERE>>
> msg.msg_namelen = 0;<< HERE>>
> msg.msg_control = calloc(1, 100);
> msg.msg_controllen = 100;
> msg.msg_iov =&iov[0];
> msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
>
>
> Remove the MSG_PEEK not needed call, and use instead :
>
> msg.msg_name =&peer;
> msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(peer);
>
>
> It should solve your problem : one single system call to get the message
> payload and metainformation (your own IP in ancillary data, and peer IP
> in&peer)
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists