[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACqU3MU-T2cftzSqufFGpYJYeiC0Vbipf+LtpBrJD4RVdef2AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:36:41 -0400
From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add Internal-reference-ID: patch tag
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
>
> Introduce "Internal-reference-ID:" for company-internal
> patch tracking. Also clarify that URLs in patches should be
> public, not private.
>
> Based on emails from Greg Kroah-Hartman.
>
> Internal-reference-ID: rdunlap.2011.0729.id1
>
What's the point of this for individuals ? Couldn't the Message-id
from the mail be re-used ?
- Arnaud
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> ---
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-3.0-git11.orig/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> +++ linux-3.0-git11/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> @@ -108,7 +108,14 @@ This benefits both the patch merger(s) a
> probably didn't even receive earlier versions of the patch.
>
> If the patch fixes a logged bug entry, refer to that bug entry by
> -number and URL.
> +number and URL (for URLs that are public, i.e., available to
> +everyone).
> +
> +Please don't include private (internal) URLs in patch descriptions,
> +so just say something like:
> + Fixes fubar.com bugzilla #4311
> +instead of
> + Fixes bugzilla.fubar.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4311
>
>
> 3) Separate your changes.
> @@ -469,7 +476,19 @@ understand the subject area and to perfo
> increase the likelihood of your patch getting into the kernel.
>
>
> -15) The canonical patch format
> +15) Internal-reference-ID: tag
> +
> +Sometimes a company wants to include an internal reference ID (tag)
> +in a patch so that they can have better patch tracking. Instead of
> +having a bazillion different such ID tags, the accepted one for
> +everyone to use is:
> +
> +Internal-reference-ID: <text>
> +
> +<text> should not be a private (internal) URL.
> +
> +
> +16) The canonical patch format
>
> The canonical patch subject line is:
>
> @@ -583,7 +602,7 @@ See more details on the proper patch for
> references.
>
>
> -16) Sending "git pull" requests (from Linus emails)
> +17) Sending "git pull" requests (from Linus emails)
>
> Please write the git repo address and branch name alone on the same line
> so that I can't even by mistake pull from the wrong branch, and so
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists