linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #39342] [3.0.0-rc6-git7] possible recursive locking atcache_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOJsxLH+qQxVwwx+2t-azc8fw+uz2+M9SCRzMUGdKKbUc1nC7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:46:19 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, maciej.rutecki@...il.com,
	florian@...kler.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #39342] [3.0.0-rc6-git7] possible recursive locking atcache_alloc_refill

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> Tetsuio, did Peter's commit 30765b9 ("slab, lockdep: Annotate the locks
>> before using them") and commit 83835b3 ("slab, lockdep: Annotate slab ->
>> rcu -> debug_object -> slab") in Linus' git fix this for you?
>
> Yes. Applying these two commits fixes this problem.
>
> Thank you.

The commits weren't tagged for -stable, I'm afraid. Peter?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/