[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110818023247.GA3750@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:32:47 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@...driver.com>
To: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
CC: <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: use 32-bit wrapper for compat_sys_futex
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:17:52AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> >diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
> >index 46c4763..f48b18e 100644
> >--- a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
> >+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
> >@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ sys_call_table:
> > PTR sys_fremovexattr /* 4235 */
> > PTR sys_tkill
> > PTR sys_sendfile64
> >- PTR compat_sys_futex
> >+ PTR sys_32_futex
>
> This change is redundant, scall64-o32.S already does the right thing
My first virsion(not sent out) doesn't include scall64-o32.S either.
> so additional zero extending is not needed and is just extra
> instructions to execute for no reason.
Why I'm adding it here is for:
1)code consistent, otherwise we must move SYSCALL_DEFINE6(32_futex,...)
under CONFIG_MIPS32_N32;
2)I'm afraid there may be some other way to touch the high 32-bit of a
register, so touching scall64-o32.S is also for safety(due to unknown
reason, fix me if I'm wrong).
Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists