linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MIPS: use 32-bit wrapper for compat_sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110818024422.GB3750@windriver.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:44:22 +0800
From:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@...driver.com>
To:	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
CC:	<linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: use 32-bit wrapper for compat_sys_futex

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:17:52AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> >  	PTR	compat_sys_sched_setaffinity
> >  	PTR	compat_sys_sched_getaffinity	/* 4240 */
> >  	PTR	compat_sys_io_setup
> 
> But really I think this patch fixes things at the wrong level.  Each
> architecture potentially needs a similar patch.  What would happen if
> we did something like:

I have thought about it but finally I decide to keep it under arch code;
because sparc64 and s390 have the same issue and they all smooth the
concern by themselves.

For sparc64:
arch/sparc/kernel/sys32.S:
91: SIGN3(sys32_futex, compat_sys_futex, %o1, %o2, %o5)

For s390:
arch/s390/kernel/compat_wrapper.S
ENTRY(compat_sys_futex_wrapper)
        llgtr   %r2,%r2                 # u32 *
	lgfr    %r3,%r3                 # int
	lgfr    %r4,%r4                 # int
	llgtr   %r5,%r5                 # struct compat_timespec *
	llgtr   %r6,%r6                 # u32 *
	lgf     %r0,164(%r15)           # int
	stg     %r0,160(%r15)
	jg	compat_sys_futex	# branch to system call

Maybe we can consolidate all of this like your patch in the future,
but it's a different issue.

Thanks,
Yong

> 
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/futex_compat.c b/kernel/futex_compat.c
> index 5f9e689..74ada65 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex_compat.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex_compat.c
> @@ -180,9 +180,9 @@ err_unlock:
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> -asmlinkage long compat_sys_futex(u32 __user *uaddr, int op, u32 val,
> -		struct compat_timespec __user *utime, u32 __user *uaddr2,
> -		u32 val3)
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE6(compat_sys_futex, u32 __user *, uaddr, int , op, u32, val,
> +		struct compat_timespec __user *, utime, u32 __user *, uaddr2,
> +		u32, val3)
>  {
>  	struct timespec ts;
>  	ktime_t t, *tp = NULL;
> 
> Obviously the function name is wrong, but a varient of
> SYSCALL_DEFINE*() could be created so the proper function names are
> produced.
> 
> David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/