linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4yoE=ndOFApoHqG+zCWn+t66W+qrhsQqb9MfHCVjO79gA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:53:42 +0800
From:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

> +
> +Pinmux board/machine configuration
> +==================================
> +
> +Boards and machines define how a certain complete running system is put
> +together, including how GPIOs and devices are muxed, how regulators are
> +constrained and how the clock tree looks. Of course pinmux settings are also
> +part of this.
> +
> +A pinmux config for a machine looks pretty much like a simple regulator
> +configuration, so for the example array above we want to enable i2c and
> +spi on the second function mapping:
> +
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
> +
> +static struct pinmux_map pmx_mapping[] = {
> +       {
> +               .function = "spi0-1",
> +               .dev_name = "foo-spi.0",
> +               .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0",
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .function = "i2c0",
> +               .dev_name = "foo-i2c.0",
> +               .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0",
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .function = "mmc0-4bit",
> +               .dev_name = "foo-mmc.0",
> +               .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0",
> +       },
> +};
> +
I have a little worry about how will this map work after all foo-spi,
foo-i2c, foo-mmc use DT. they will lose those simple name just
foo-spi.0, foo-spi.1, foo-spi.2 except that we use OF_DEV_AUXDATA_ID.
the actual device name might be foo-spi.200fee or something like that.
then this map will have the same problem with the current clock/device
mapping.
could we have a way to define the connection between device and pinmux
in DTS directly?

Thanks
barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/