linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdaS6KiZGxSOE=T4ErXAPoWoYWYWFNVancWjQV1L4SCAew@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:29:48 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:

>> IIRC Greg would prefer now to never have had the distinction
>> and wants to make all future uses use a bus_type.
>
> Yes, that is totally correct.  Kay has also written much more about this
> and why this is the way forward many times in the past, see lkml
> archives for the details if anyone is interested.

Nah I trust you, I will switch it to use bus_type instead no problem.

Thanks!
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/