[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E5146C1.508@fusionio.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:56:17 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] block bits for 3.1-rc
On 2011-08-20 19:41, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 03:16:40PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> - Revert of the CFQ meta data special treatment patch, it's been shown
>> to regress a kernel build workload by about 10%. More investigation
>> is needed, for 3.1 lets just back it out.
>
> Sorry, but you can't simply do that without any coordination. We have
> added that marker to xfs now that the stupid special casing stopped,
> and turning it back on will cause us massive slowdows. Next time
> please better coordinate this with its users. In fact I have never
> seen this patch or a discussion on any mailinglist.
The discussion was on lkml, as Mike points out. But yes, short time to
react. Since I can't easily cater to both cases right now, how about we
add a temporary second meta flag that is only used for tracing?
REQ_META = (__REQ_META | __REQ_META_TRACE),
RET_META_TRACE = __REQ_META_TRACE,
You get the idea. Not super pretty, but it should solve the immediate
issue.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists