[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110821181935.GA28979@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:19:35 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] block bits for 3.1-rc
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 07:56:17PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> The discussion was on lkml, as Mike points out. But yes, short time to
> react. Since I can't easily cater to both cases right now, how about we
> add a temporary second meta flag that is only used for tracing?
>
> REQ_META = (__REQ_META | __REQ_META_TRACE),
> RET_META_TRACE = __REQ_META_TRACE,
>
> You get the idea. Not super pretty, but it should solve the immediate
> issue.
I'd do it the other way around and add a new REQ_META_BOOST flag to
the old callers. I'll cook up a patch on the airport / on my flight
if you want.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists