[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1314008796.19751.28.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:26:36 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 35/43] unicore32: Use set_current_blocked() and
block_sigmask()
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 10:15 +0800, Guan Xuetao wrote:
> Hi, Matt
> Could you add me (and other relevant people) to the patch series, or at
> least the main patches in the series, since the separated patch is hard
> to understand, and can't be tested.
>
> For signal patches, I can only test it by booting up the system, running
> some commands, and perhaps, running lmbench or ltp.
> Is there any testsuite specified to signal part?
>
>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Thanks Matt.
> Guan Xuetao
Hi Guan,
Unfortunately there are too many maintainers to add directly to the Cc
list. However, I did reply to the first patch in the series (the only
other one that matters for arch maintainers) and added yourself and
linux-arch, so hopefully the rest of the arch maintainers will find it
there. But just to be complete, the link to the patch is here,
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/19/409
There isn't really a specific testsuite that I would recommend, though
I'm pretty sure that LTP has some signal-related test cases. Booting up
your system and running some commands (and perhaps interrupting them
with Ctrl-C) should be good enough.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists