[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4E524B71020000A1000070C6@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:28:33 +0200
From: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@...uni-regensburg.de>
To: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@...uni-regensburg.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Antw: Q: /sys/block and I/O Schedulers
>>> Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@...uni-regensburg.de> schrieb am 22.08.2011 um 12:10
in Nachricht <4E522B1A.1E1 : 161 : 60728>:
> Hi!
>
> I have a question: Reading the docs on I/O Schedulers, I had the impression
> the docs wanted to tell me that only the low-level devices (i.e. disks) use
> I/O Schedulers, while higher-level devices (like multipaths, RAIDs, LVs,
> etc.) don't.
>
> Using the SLES11 SP1 kernel (2.6.32.43-0.4-xen), I found out that LVs seem
> to use the I/O Scheduler, while RAID1 don't seem to do so. Also a disk in a
Forget the statement about RAID1; I just overlooked it in the list.
> Xen DomU also uses an I/O Scheduler (in addition to those being used in Dom0
> for the same device already)
>
> Is that correct, and if so, why is that? Is there a change to be seen in the
> future?
>
> My test was as simple as this:
> /sys/block # for d in *
> > do
> > echo $d: $(<$d/queue/scheduler)
> > done
> cciss!c0d0: noop anticipatory deadline [cfq]
> dm-0: noop anticipatory deadline [cfq]
> [...]
> loop0: none
> [...]
> md4: none
> sda: noop anticipatory deadline [cfq]
> [...]
>
> As I'm not subscribed to the list, I'd appreciate any CC: to my address.
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Ulrich
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists