linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ptrace tree related)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:06:26 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
 (ptrace tree related)

On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 16:03 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> kernel/signal.c: In function 'block_sigmask':
> kernel/signal.c:2333:26: error: 'SA_NODEFER' undeclared (first use in this function)
> 
> Caused by commit 932e5a25b9cf ("signal: Add block_sigmask() for adding
> sigmask to current->blocked").  Sparc seems to use SA_NOMASK in the
> equivalent bit of code and has no SA_NODEFER definition.
> 
> I discovered this after releasing linux-next today.

Ouch, my bad. Thanks for the heads up Stephen!

Guys, how about this patch?

--------8<--------

>From 1358a0ab01b95344cd542e5139bc4865650fbf4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:54:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sparc: Make SA_NOMASK a synonym of SA_NODEFER

Unlike other architectures, sparc currently has no SA_NODEFER
definition but only the older SA_NOMASK. Since SA_NOMASK is the
historical name for SA_NODEFER, add SA_NODEFER and copy what other
architectures do by making SA_NOMASK a synonym for SA_NODEFER.

Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
---
 arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
index e49b828..aa42fe3 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/signal.h
@@ -143,10 +143,11 @@ struct sigstack {
 #define SA_ONSTACK	_SV_SSTACK
 #define SA_RESTART	_SV_INTR
 #define SA_ONESHOT	_SV_RESET
-#define SA_NOMASK	0x20u
+#define SA_NODEFER	0x20u
 #define SA_NOCLDWAIT    0x100u
 #define SA_SIGINFO      0x200u
 
+#define SA_NOMASK	SA_NODEFER
 
 #define SIG_BLOCK          0x01	/* for blocking signals */
 #define SIG_UNBLOCK        0x02	/* for unblocking signals */
-- 
1.7.4.4



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/