linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ptrace tree related)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:16:31 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
	(ptrace tree related)

Hi Stephen,

sorry for delay.

On 08/23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> kernel/signal.c: In function 'block_sigmask':
> kernel/signal.c:2333:26: error: 'SA_NODEFER' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> Caused by commit 932e5a25b9cf ("signal: Add block_sigmask() for adding
> sigmask to current->blocked").

Yes. My bad. I've reset this commit.

> Sparc seems to use SA_NOMASK in the
> equivalent bit of code and has no SA_NODEFER definition.

Yes, I'll push the updated patch(es).


Thanks!

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/