[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110823231657.GC9955@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:16:57 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] Staging: hv: vmbus: Fix checkpatch warnings
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:44:21AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> Fix checkpatch warnings in hv.c
>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/hv/hv.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/hv.c b/drivers/staging/hv/hv.c
> index e733173..14e6315 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/hv/hv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/hv/hv.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static u64 do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, void *output)
> u64 hv_status = 0;
> u64 input_address = (input) ? virt_to_phys(input) : 0;
> u64 output_address = (output) ? virt_to_phys(output) : 0;
> - volatile void *hypercall_page = hv_context.hypercall_page;
> + void *hypercall_page = hv_context.hypercall_page;
Are you sure? This was just someone being foolish? No other reason
someone tried to use volatile here?
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists