[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1314210701.16133.13.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:31:40 -0700
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>
Cc: "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"Song, Youquan" <youquan.song@...el.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] iommu: move IOMMU specific code to intel-iommu.c
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 02:27 -0700, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:05:20PM -0400, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > +static void __init dmar_register_rmrr_unit(struct dmar_rmrr_unit *rmrr)
> > +int __init dmar_parse_one_rmrr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header)
> > +int __init dmar_parse_one_atsr(struct acpi_dmar_header *hdr)
> > +int dmar_find_matched_atsr_unit(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > +int dmar_parse_rmrr_atsr_dev(void)
>
> If these functions are not DMAR specific, how about replacing the dmar_
> prefix too while at it?
These parsing functions are APCI DMAR table specific and are used only
by intel-iommu routines. Because of this I didn't change their names but
just moved to intel-iommu.c to cleanup some of the ifdef's in the common
dmar.c code (specific to handling common ACPI DMAR tables etc) shared by
both DMA-remapping (iommu) and IRQ-remapping.
thanks,
suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists