linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] cgroup: introduce cgroup_taskset and consolidate subsys methods, take#2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:56:09 -0700
From:	Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, rjw@...k.pl,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
	matthltc@...ibm.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] cgroup: introduce cgroup_taskset and consolidate
 subsys methods, take#2

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 04:05:39PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> It's fine for me to route those patches through pm-freezer, since this
>> work is initiated and needed for the work on freezer.
>
> Awesome.  Paul, what do you think?  Rafael, if Paul agrees, can you
> please take in this series?
>

Sure - but can you make sure that there's nothing in -mm that
conflicts with this patchset? If there is, then maybe cherry-pick
those into pm-freezer too, and fix them up?

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/