linux-kernel - Re: [RFD] Task counter: cgroup core feature or cgroup subsystem? (was Re: [PATCH 0/8 v3] cgroups: Task counter subsystem)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:58:16 -0700
From:	Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
To:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Tim Hockin <thockin@...kin.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Task counter: cgroup core feature or cgroup subsystem? (was
 Re: [PATCH 0/8 v3] cgroups: Task counter subsystem)

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> I had a patchset that can make things even better. The patchset is
> to bind/unbind a subsystem to/from an existing cgroup hierarchy.

Sigh, I'd been meaning to comment on that great patchset for ages, but
they kind of slipped out of my attention :-( I'll try to look over
them again - do they still apply cleanly after all the recent changes?

The bindability is orthogonal to the multi-subsystem support, I think
- they definitely complement each other.

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/