[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALdu-PD0EBK7YvxeuxVw5Z21JvfqbgiUoR5Wh3Of-FhG+VE3zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:58:16 -0700
From: Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Tim Hockin <thockin@...kin.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Task counter: cgroup core feature or cgroup subsystem? (was
Re: [PATCH 0/8 v3] cgroups: Task counter subsystem)
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> I had a patchset that can make things even better. The patchset is
> to bind/unbind a subsystem to/from an existing cgroup hierarchy.
Sigh, I'd been meaning to comment on that great patchset for ages, but
they kind of slipped out of my attention :-( I'll try to look over
them again - do they still apply cleanly after all the recent changes?
The bindability is orthogonal to the multi-subsystem support, I think
- they definitely complement each other.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists