[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E57C8A9.1070301@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:24:09 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Ralf Jung <ralfjung-e@....de>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, ioapic: Reserve only 128 bytes for IOAPICs
On 08/26/2011 09:21 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> Is there some spec that requires all IOAPICs to be 1K aligned? I
> don't doubt that's the case; I'd just like to see something more
> concrete than folklore. I'm pretty sure there's some (possibly
> secret) "IOAPIC architecture spec," and a section reference to it
> would be nice. Even before my patch, I don't think we actually
> checked or enforced any *alignment* -- we only set the size. I don't
> know if it's worth it unless we have a problem it would fix, and it's
> conceivable that we'd start warning about a perfectly functional
> IOAPIC that's 128-byte aligned.
>
The PIIX3 IOAPIC decoder could only decode addresses on a 1K
granularity, but I don't think that was architectural. I will try to ask.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists