[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201108291346.29847.philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:46:23 +0200
From: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
To: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [RFC 000/118] drbd: part 1 of adding multiple volume support to drbd
Am Freitag, 26. August 2011, 15:20:51 schrieb Greg Freemyer:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Philipp Reisner <
>
> philipp.reisner@...bit.com> wrote:
> > This the first request for review of drbd-8.4. The complete set has
> > 500 patches. In this first series there are only 118 of these.
>
> Lars,
>
> I've only taken a quick glance, but is drbd functional between applying
> each patch?
>
> It doesn't look like it to me, but I didn't look that close. I also saw at
> least one patch that introduced a new function with no caller to test it.
>
> The idea is that a patch series leave a testable / functional kernel after
> each patch in the series is applied sequentially.
>
> That is the only way git bisect can do its job.
>
> ie. Introducing a new function but no new caller makes a change, but there
> is no way to test it. Therefore there is no real value in not merging that
> patch with one that has the new call in it.
>
Greg,
You replied to mail 000. Please point out to which patch/function you
refer, so that we can fix this.
Best,
Phil
--
: Dipl-Ing Philipp Reisner
: LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
: Tel: +43-1-8178292-50, Fax: +43-1-8178292-82
: http://www.linbit.com
DRBD(R) and LINBIT(R) are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists