[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110829073828.GA18871@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:38:28 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, paul@...lmenage.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] freezer: fix set_freezable[_with_signal]() race
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> You know, I was really, really puzzled by this change. Because it
> "obviously can fix nothing", and try_to_freeze() makes no sense
> (ignoring the very unlikely case when TIF_FREEZING was set right
> after we drop freezer_lock).
>
> But I guess this works along with 14/16 which removes TIF_FREEZING.
Ah, yeah, another case of bad sequencing. Sorry about that.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists