[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110830011719.GB8505@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:17:19 -0400
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: RFD: x32 ABI system call numbers
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:01:37PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 03:42, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > time_t really *should* be 64-bit, the same way "off_t" should be. If
> > it's not, there's something wrong.
>
> Which will break all this non-portable 32-bit-only source code x32 was invented
> for in the first place?
> Someone will pass a time_t or off_t and an innocent pointer to a custom
> printf-alike function to format it like "%u %s" and it will go bang...
Well, for old static binaries, the old syscall ABI would still have to
use 32-bit off_t's and time_t's. And for dynamically linked binaries,
glibc could deal with the compatibility issues with the old ABI,
across the shared library interface, right?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists