linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] fat: Batched discard support for fat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874o0xlb9p.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date:	Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:51:46 +0900
From:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To:	Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>
Cc:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] fat: Batched discard support for fat

Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org> writes:

> Hi Ogawa,

Hi,

> Do you still object to merge batched discard support on fat?
>
> If the current batched discard concept doesn't changed, it can't merge it?

I'm not blaming "concept". I'm saying current implements (and due to
current interface confusion) is confusing and makes userland hard to use it.

I really think I explained all my concerns and current implement
confusion.

Last time I checked, those implementations had even the different error
code at EOF. How can I say your implement will work without knowing
right implement?

Again, it is reason, and I'm not blaming "concept" or your implement
itself.

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/