[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1110051636220.4423@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:38:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] fat: Batched discard support for fat
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org> writes:
>
> > Hi Ogawa,
>
> Hi,
>
> > Do you still object to merge batched discard support on fat?
> >
> > If the current batched discard concept doesn't changed, it can't merge it?
>
> I'm not blaming "concept". I'm saying current implements (and due to
> current interface confusion) is confusing and makes userland hard to use it.
>
> I really think I explained all my concerns and current implement
> confusion.
>
> Last time I checked, those implementations had even the different error
> code at EOF. How can I say your implement will work without knowing
> right implement?
>
> Again, it is reason, and I'm not blaming "concept" or your implement
> itself.
>
> Thanks.
Please see test #260 in xfstests, which was recently added to check for
common mistakes in FITRIM argument handling.
Thanks!
-Lukas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists