[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110905155347.GA17354@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:53:47 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: Add comment explaining task state setting in
bdi_forker_thread()
On Mon 05-09-11 20:44:11, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:01:41PM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Sun 04-09-11 11:05:51, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > @@ -401,6 +401,13 @@ static int bdi_forker_thread(void *ptr)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock);
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * In the following loop we are going to check whether we have
> > > > + * some work to do without any synchronization with tasks
> > > > + * waking us up to do work for them. So we have to set task
> > > > + * state already here so that we don't miss wakeups coming
> > >
> > > s/already/early/ ?
> > Thanks for review. We'd have to substitute 'already here' with 'early'
> > for the sentence to make make sense. But frankly I don't see why one would
> > be better than the other one...
>
> You are the native English speaker? OK, I have no more problems... ;)
No, I'm not a native English speaker. Maybe that's why I don't see that
much difference :-))
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists