[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA7CETUa0i3U20ifz5YjXAywTGD2NEQt1GcJz1OwY_DtEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:23:33 -0400
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and
>> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no
>> tree today.
>>
> What about github ? gitorious ?
>
> If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk
> usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB.
Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next
pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well. A lot
of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next
tree at best. Probably better to just wait.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists