| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACqU3MXQw4+QyBmCPcO8ZmYu0T6N+DStXBoa=JUv+ej6cWMTnw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:29:23 -0400 From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com> To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6 Hi, On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and >>> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no >>> tree today. >>> >> What about github ? gitorious ? >> >> If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk >> usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB. > > Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next > pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well. A lot > of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next > tree at best. Probably better to just wait. > That's just insane... git is distributed, but still used centrally. Kernel development should just not be impacted by such issues. - Arnaud -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists