[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110906190615.GA31897@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:06:15 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Mike Sterling <mike.sterling@...rosoft.com>
Cc: haiyangz@...rosoft.com, hjanssen@...rosoft.com, kys@...rosoft.com,
gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: hv: Add support for >2 TB LUN in storage
driver.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 03:11:09PM -0700, Mike Sterling wrote:
> If a LUN larger than 2 TB is attached to a Linux VM on Hyper-V, we currently
> report a maximum size of 2 TB. This patch resolves the issue in hv_storvsc.
> Thanks to Robert Scheck <robert.scheck@...s.de> for reporting the issue.
>
> Reported-by: Robert Scheck <robert.scheck@...s.de>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Sterling <mike.sterling@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: K.Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/hv/hyperv_storage.h | 1 +
This file is no longer in the latest kernel tree (linux-next or
staging-next). What tree did you generate this patch against? And
how come Haiyang and KY didn't catch such a basic mistake in their
review...
I'm guessing that this patch was not even tested :(
Please fix this and resend.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists