lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:08:15 +0200
From:	Sylwester Nawrocki <snjw23@...il.com>
To:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
CC:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
	Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [media] at91: add code to initialize and manage the
 ISI_MCK for Atmel ISI driver.

On 09/06/2011 10:05 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> I'm not entirely sure on this one, but as we had a similar situation with
>> clocks, we decided to extablish the clock hierarchy in the board code, and
>> only deal with the actual device clocks in the driver itself. I.e., we
>> moved all clk_set_parent() and setting up the parent clock into the board.
>> And I do think, this makes more sense, than doing this in the driver, not
>> all users of this driver will need to manage the parent clock, right?
>
> I don't like to manage the clock in the board except if it's manadatory otherwise
> we manage this at soc level
> 
> the driver does not have to manage the clock hierachy or detail implementation
> but manage the clock enable/disable and speed depending on it's need

We had a similar problem in the past and we ended up having the boot loader
setting up the parent clock for the device clock. The driver only controls clock
gating and sets its clock frequency based on an internal IP version information,
derived from the SoC revision.

AFAIK there is also a generic API at the runtime PM core so the driver can
register the clock(s) with it and only use pm_runtime_clk_* calls afterwards.

--
Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ