[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110907110022.GA6012@localhost>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:00:22 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] writeback: per task dirty rate limit
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 03:31:56PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 09:04 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
>
> > So the sqrt naturally leads to less overheads and more N tolerance for
> > large memory servers, which have large (thresh-freerun) gaps.
>
> Thanks, and as you say its an initial guess, later refined using patch
> 14.
Yes, exactly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists