| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110907091602.56e4192b@endymion.delvare> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:16:02 +0200 From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [GIT PULL] hwmon fixes for 3.1 On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:16:13 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Guenter Roeck > <guenter.roeck@...csson.com> wrote: > > > > Please pull hwmon subsystem fixes for Linux 3.1 from: > > > > git://github.com/groeck/linux.git hwmon-for-linus > > Guys, when using some general git hosting site, I really want some > proof that you are you. Not just a "please pull". > > Tell me *why* I should believe that this is a real pull request from > the proper source. Otherwise I'll just wait until kernel.org is back > to life, where random people can't just create repositories and send > email. FWIW: * This pull request from Guenter matches the recent patch reviews on the lm-sensors list. * I have reviewed the 3 patches as they exist in the mentioned repository and branch and they match what has been approved on the list. * All the e-mail headers are exactly as I would expect from Guenter. So while I can't guarantee that Guenter is Guenter, the pull request definitely looks sane and safe. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists