[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110908002947.GA9477@localhost>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 08:29:47 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: Add comment explaining task state setting in
bdi_forker_thread()
> grammar can often be fixed/improved by deleting stuff ;)
>
> --- a/mm/backing-dev.c~mm-add-comment-explaining-task-state-setting-in-bdi_forker_thread-fix
> +++ a/mm/backing-dev.c
> @@ -404,9 +404,8 @@ static int bdi_forker_thread(void *ptr)
> /*
> * In the following loop we are going to check whether we have
> * some work to do without any synchronization with tasks
> - * waking us up to do work for them. So we have to set task
> - * state already here so that we don't miss wakeups coming
> - * after we verify some condition.
> + * waking us up to do work for them. Set the task state here
> + * so that we don't miss wakeups after verifying conditions.
> */
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
That's nice and readable, thanks!
Regards,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists