[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110910183336.GB30865@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:33:36 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/25] Staging: hv: vmbus: Return proper error code in
vmbus_remove()
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 02:22:22PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@...ah.com]
> > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 4:43 PM
> > To: KY Srinivasan
> > Cc: gregkh@...e.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > devel@...uxdriverproject.org; virtualization@...ts.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/25] Staging: hv: vmbus: Return proper error code in
> > vmbus_remove()
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:24:21AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > > Return proper error code in vmbus_remove().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/staging/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> > > index b9aeb76..95d33a4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> > > @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static int vmbus_probe(struct device *child_device)
> > > */
> > > static int vmbus_remove(struct device *child_device)
> > > {
> > > - int ret;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> >
> > As remove functions can't fail, why return anything at all?
> >
> > Doesn't make sense, please fix.
>
> Greg,
>
> Looking at the struct bus_type, the remove function is not a void function.
Yeah, but it's never checked, and most bus types just use a void
function as the function can not fail (or, it's not allowed to at
least.)
> I was just fixing something that was broken in this function.
That's fine, then you can add it to the list of things to change :)
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists