[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6E21E5352C11B742B20C142EB499E048081DC4C7@TK5EX14MBXC128.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:31:15 +0000
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: "gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 09/25] Staging: hv: util: Perform some service specific
de-initialization in util_remove()
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@...ah.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 4:43 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: gregkh@...e.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; virtualization@...ts.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/25] Staging: hv: util: Perform some service specific de-
> initialization in util_remove()
>
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:24:20AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > In preparation for modifying the util driver to fully conform to the
> > Linux Driver Model, perform some service specific de-initialization in
> > util_remove() as opposed to in exit_hyperv_utils() as is currently done.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/hv/hv_util.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/hv_util.c b/drivers/staging/hv/hv_util.c
> > index b86128a..2475ab2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/hv/hv_util.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/hv/hv_util.c
> > @@ -291,6 +291,30 @@ error:
> > static int util_remove(struct hv_device *dev,
> > const struct hv_vmbus_device_id *dev_id)
> > {
> > + int service = dev_id->driver_data;
> > +
> > + switch (service) {
> > + case HV_SHUTDOWN:
> > + kfree(shut_txf_buf);
> > + break;
>
> This switch and "static" pointers you need to free aren't needed at all
> if you do this code logic correctly (i.e. a per-device buffer.)
>
> {sigh}
>
> I'm stopping reviewing now, this is making me grumpy, someone owes me a
> bunch of beer...
Greg,
I will rework this to be more on the lines of what you had suggested; and yes,
I remember my original promise! I want to re-spin these patches and send it to
you as soon as possible. Which tree can I clone to get your latest check-ins; kernel.org
still seems to have issues this morning. Have you checked in Olaf's patches.
Thanks,
K. Y
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists