[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110910020110.GA8696@zhy>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:01:10 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, Sam Creasey <sammy@...my.net>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/62] m64k: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:05:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 05:18, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com> wrote:
> > On 07/09/11 18:10, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >>
> >> This flag is a NOOP and can be removed now.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang0@...il.com>
> >
> > Looks ok to me:
> >
> > Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>
>
> Except for the subject, it's m68k, not m64k ;-)
Sorry for the typo.
>
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>
> Sorry, I missed the introductary email [0/62].
I sent it out, but seems it didn't reach LKML due to the compromise
of kernel.org.
> But do you expect the individual
> maintainers to take these patches, or are you just collecting Acks?
Quoted from Thomas's reply to Ralf (MIPS):
[ We can hold off the "remove the define" patch until 3.2-rc1 and push
it along with everything which hasn't been merged until then.
Alternatively I can pick the whole MIPS bunch as well. I let Ralf
decide. ]
So the same rule here, you can decide it :)
Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists