lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:04:34 -0400
From:	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
CC:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux Driver Project <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] zram: Set initial disksize to some default value

On 09/09/2011 08:50 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:

> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:18:56 EDT, Nitin Gupta said:
>> On 09/09/2011 07:12 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:01:04PM -0400, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>>>> Currently, we set initial disksize as 0, which forces
>>>> user to write some value to corresponding zram device's
>>>> sysfs node, before the device can be used. Now, we avoid
>>>> this step by providing some default size initially.
>>>>
>>>> To change the disksize, user must:
>>>>  - Reset disk.
>>>> 	Ex: echo 1 > /sys/block/zram0/reset
>>>> (NOTE: disksize is set to the default value after reset)
>>>>
>>>>  - Set new disksize.
>>>> 	Ex: echo $((256*1024*1024)) > /sys/block/zram0/disksize
>>>
>>> So, what tools just broke with this change?
>>>
>>> And where is the sysfs file documentation change that should go along
>>> with this?
>>>
>>
>>
>> This change does not change any sysfs names or behavior, so does not
>> break any scripts that assume the current behavior.
> 
> Consider the current case:   We init size to zero, and a startup script changes
> it to 1024 and then sticks 768 of data in there.  No Problem.
> 
> We now get a kernel that's built with a default of 512.  The startup script
> tries to change it to 1024, but doesn't know it has to splat something into
> 'reset' for it to actually work.  It then tries to stick 768 of data in there,
> and hilarity ensues...
> 
> If I haven't misunderstood...
> 


Setting default size of say 512 doesn't make the device initialized.
The initialization happens only when user issues any I/O to the device
and only after initialization the disksize cannot be changed.
So, when user writes say 768 as new disksize in uninitialized state, the
new disksize will take effect and there will be no surprises.

Device reset is needed only when user wants to discard existing data and
bring device to uninitialized state again, after which disksize can be
changed again.

Nitin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ