linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] iommu/core: split mapping to page sizes as supported by the hardware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK=WgbbhdFpAHTt=Bku-v1ZOCf48+u+XB-f4yO=5EDojv1kCJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:34:23 +0300
From:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To:	"Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>
Cc:	"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iommu/core: split mapping to page sizes as supported
 by the hardware

Hi Joerg,

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Roedel, Joerg <Joerg.Roedel@....com> wrote:
> Please split this patch into the core-change and patches for the
> individual iommu-drivers and post this as a seperate patch-set.

But we'll be breaking bisectibility this way, no ?

> Intel IOMMU does not support arbitrary page-sizes, afaik.

It does; besides the usual 4K it has "super page sizes" support of
2MB, 1GB, 512GB and 1TB.

>> +       pr_debug("map: iova 0x%lx pa 0x%lx size 0x%lx\n", iova,
>> +                                       (unsigned long)paddr, size);
>
> Please keep the debug-code in a seperate patch in your dev-tree. No need
> for it to be merged upstream.

It's actually useful sometimes to have those around - it's off by
default, and can be enabled only when needed (CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG).

But I don't mind removing them.

Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/