[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110913193407.16c8c5bb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:34:07 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 06/11] mm: memcg: remove optimization of keeping the
root_mem_cgroup LRU lists empty
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:57:23 +0200
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com> wrote:
> root_mem_cgroup, lacking a configurable limit, was never subject to
> limit reclaim, so the pages charged to it could be kept off its LRU
> lists. They would be found on the global per-zone LRU lists upon
> physical memory pressure and it made sense to avoid uselessly linking
> them to both lists.
>
> The global per-zone LRU lists are about to go away on memcg-enabled
> kernels, with all pages being exclusively linked to their respective
> per-memcg LRU lists. As a result, pages of the root_mem_cgroup must
> also be linked to its LRU lists again.
>
> The overhead is temporary until the double-LRU scheme is going away
> completely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists