[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110913160645.GA6258@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:06:45 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Temporary -rcu tree location
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:06:47PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:07:16PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:34:00 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > there doesn't seem to be 'rcu/next' branch, right?
> > >
> > > No, there is not. So the idea is to push "rcu/next" the first time,
> > > then ":rcu/next" thereafter?
> >
> > Can't you just do a (forced) push over and over again without removing
> > the branch each time?
>
> I will give it a try on the next update. ;-)
OK, I pushed a small update to one of the commits, this time to branch
rcu/next, again at https://github.com/paulmckrcu/linux.
I guess that the acid test is the next time I update. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists