[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6360771.ouEC5EKNMR@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:43:56 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] C6X: devicetree
On Monday 12 September 2011 19:20:35 Mark Salter wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 14:11 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 05:26:41PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > + interrupt-controller;
> > > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > > + compatible = "ti,c64x+core-pic";
> >
> > The interrupt controller isn't addressable? Is it integrated into
> > the CPU?
>
> Yes, that core controller is controlled through registers accessed
> with special-purpose instructions, not MMIO. Other controllers, like
> megamodule and some as-yet unimplemented use MMIO.
Are these instructions specific to the interrupt controller or
do they access a register space that can contain arbitrary
devices?
If there is a separate address space for special devices, it might
be good to describe that in the device tree, like we do for PCI
I/O space.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists