lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:43:56 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] C6X: devicetree

On Monday 12 September 2011 19:20:35 Mark Salter wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 14:11 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 05:26:41PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > +           interrupt-controller;
> > > +           #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > > +           compatible = "ti,c64x+core-pic";
> > 
> > The interrupt controller isn't addressable?  Is it integrated into
> > the CPU?
> 
> Yes, that core controller is controlled through registers accessed
> with special-purpose instructions, not MMIO. Other controllers, like
> megamodule and some as-yet unimplemented use MMIO.

Are these instructions specific to the interrupt controller or
do they access a register space that can contain arbitrary
devices?

If there is a separate address space for special devices, it might
be good to describe that in the device tree, like we do for PCI
I/O space.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ